Thursday, August 30, 2007

Momma T's Struggle



A recent article on the new book on Mother Teresa says:

The depth of her doubts could be viewed by nonbelievers and skeptics as more evidence of the emptiness of religious belief. But Roman Catholic scholars and supporters of the woman who toiled in Calcutta's slums and called herself 'a pencil in God's hand' argue that her struggles make her more accessible and her work all the more remarkable.

"It shows that she wasn't a plaster-of-Paris saint who never had a doubt about God or the ultimate meaning of life," said the Rev. Richard McBrien, a University of Notre Dame theology professor and author of "Lives of the Saints." "This can only enhance her reputation as a saintly person with people who aren't easily impressed with pious stories. Those who think otherwise have a lot of learning to do about the complexities of life and about the nature of faith."

The struggle of faith is sometimes called "The Dark Night of the Soul", this from wikipedia:

The term and metaphysicality of the phrase "dark night of the soul" are taken from the writings of the Spanish poet and Roman Catholic mystic Saint John of the Cross, a Carmelite priest in the 16th century. Dark Night of the Soul is the name of both a poem, and a commentary on that poem, and are among the Carmelite priest's most famous writings. They tell of his mystic development and the stages he went through on his quest for holiness.

The "dark night" could generally be described as
a letting go of our ego's hold on the psyche, making room for change that can bring about a complete transformation of a person's way of defining his/her self and their relationship to God. The interim period can be frightening, hence the perceived "darkness".

Rather than being a negative event, the dark night is believed by mystics and others to be a blessing in disguise where the individual extends from a state of contemplative prayer to an inability to pray. Particularly in Christianity, it is seen as a severe test of one's faith.

Mother Teresa makes it hard for someone to be anti-Catholic (which I'm not). Perhaps more than any other single Christian in the 20th Century, she demonstrated a life sold out to God and to her particular gift of mercy. Hers was a tough row to hoe, even if she did sometimes garner legitimate criticisms.

This revelation about her journey through doubt is actually a testament of faith. Some of the most daring and risk-taking missionaries faced these things. Depression and doubt are not necessarily demonic. Often depression is more like a physical ailment. But just like men fighting in real-world combat, those who engage in spiritual combat face shell-shock and post-war trauma.

The journey into darkness is often where one finds God hiding.

Psalm 97: 2 Clouds and thick darkness are all around him; righteousness and justice are the foundation of his throne.

This speaks of the mystery of God. He dwells in the thick darkness.
And sometimes, maybe even often, it is in our darkest passages that we find Him more poignantly.

How odd, that faith would spring from the very dark soil of doubt.

But where else is your faith more tested?

We hear teachers speak of "demonstrating faith" or "doing miracles" as the great proof of faith. But what greater demonstration than Job in the pits of despair who cried, "Though skinworms devour my flesh, yet will I praise Him."

Clinical depression is another matter, but the dark night of the soul turns out to be an opportunity. One emerges more blessed than ever before.
A long journey through darkness, as with Mother Teresa, may the more identify her undying hope, love, and faith.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Revolution of Hope

Brian McLaren and his gang do a music video. A little amateurish, but who likes polished? The song is interesting lyrically and its message. Let the revolution begin.

Friday, August 24, 2007

Fugitive From Sin



Fugitive From Sin
(1976)

From the dust I came
One thing's for sure I'm goin' back again
Same way I came
And every passing hour
I'm constantly wrestling with an unseen power
Warring for my soul.

Wading through a swamp of serpents
Across a scorpion desert
Over a mountain of midnight terrors
Through a stormy sea of no passage
Chills crawling over my skin
I'm a fugitive from sin.

Groping for a ray of light
Pushing my way, straining for sight
With all of my might
Hoping for relief
But what I find seems all too brief
I fall in a heap.

Climbing like a mountain-goat
Pushing like a pachyderm
Kicking like a crazy man
Hunted in the Amazon
Wondering if I can win
Heading for a tailspin
Chills crawling over my skin
I'm a fugitive from sin.

My lungs about to burst
Black-out dizzy, lips cracked from thirst
And getting worse
Knowing somehow I'll find it
Though I'm walking lame, seeing blind,
And falling behind.

Running through a forest aflame
With a pack of dogs at my heels
Vultures waiting up in the sky
With my pulse getting hard to feel
I can't hear above the noise and the din
Don't know where to go
Forgot where I've been
Wondering if I can win
Heading for a tailspin
Chills crawling over my skin ~
I'm a fugitive from sin.
I wrote this as a song when I was in my twenties. It tries to describe the conflict involved in learning to walk contrary to the flesh. But I've always liked the imagery of it. It has a cool tune to it as well.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

After Two Days



Hosea 6:
1 "Come, let us return to the LORD.
He has torn us to pieces
but he will heal us;
he has injured us
but he will bind up our wounds.
2
After two days he will revive us;
on the third day he will restore us,
that we may live in his presence.
3 Let us acknowledge the LORD;
let us press on to acknowledge him.
As surely as the sun rises,
he will appear;
he will come to us like the winter rains,
like the spring rains that water the earth."

John 2:
18Then the Jews demanded of him, "What miraculous sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?"
19Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days."
20The Jews replied, "It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?" 21But the temple he had spoken of was his body. 22After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the Scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.

Hosea was one of the minor prophets in Israel who was trying to revive the people from their apostasy. Verse 2 above mentions 3 "days." "Within two days, God says, I will revive you. On the third day I will raise you up."

2 Peter 3: 8 says, "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day." Also Psalm 90:4.

Back in the days of Hosea, and continuing on into Peter's day, there was a belief that history would last 7 millennial days. The idea went that there had been 2,000 years from Adam to Abraham they called the "age of chaos." There would be 2,000 more years that were the "age of law." Then there would be 2,000 years of an "age of the Messiah." These rabbis thought Messiah would come, then, at about the time of Jesus. He did come, but many didn't recognize him.

According to this reckoning, a day was equal to 1,000 years, and Jesus arrived right at the close of 4,000 years from Adam (using biblical chronologies). So we see that Jesus said, "After two days He would raise up the temple," but he was speaking in veiled terms: he meant his own body.

There are two "bodies" in scripture with regard to Christ. One is his own body and one is the corporate body, the church. He raised his own body after two literal days when he came out of the grave that Sunday morning. He will raise his church also, we may reason, after two millennial days.

In Acts 1 we see that Jesus rose into the heavens, presumably in 30AD, the most likely year for that event. Ten days later the church was born on the feast of Pentecost. If we add 2,000 years (2 days) to that birthday, we have 2030AD as the possible end of the Gentile Age, or what the Jews had called the "Age of Messiah."
Is this a prophetic key? It won't be too long until we know.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

The Name That Divides



OrlandoSentinel.com
OTHER VIEWS
Start using 'Allah' instead of 'God'?
Kathleen Parker
Washington Post Writer's Group
August 19, 2007
WASHINGTON

It was bound to happen -- and it seems fitting that a cleric named Tiny would think of it.Roman Catholic Bishop Tiny Muskens of the Netherlands has decided that the way to ease Muslim-Everybody Else tensions is to start using "Allah" instead of "God."

Noting that God does not care what we call him, Muskens thought, why not yield a little to Muslim ways?Or would that be submit, the literal meaning of "Islam"?........

Contrary to Hooper's one-God claim, Christians and Muslims don't really worship the same God. Although both religions are monotheistic -- and if there's just one God, there's just one God -- Christians believe Jesus was the Son of God and Muslims think otherwise.That's not a small doctrinal difference.

In fact, at the risk of exhausting the obvious, Christianity doesn't exist without, um, Christ. Of course we could rewrite the Apostle's Creed to include Muhammad: "I believe in Allah the Father Almighty . . . and in Muhammad, his favorite prophet . . ."The possibilities are infinite, really. Alternatively, we could pretend to be sane and suggest that everybody go to his or her own house of worship, pray to his or her own version of the Creator, and otherwise get a grip......

Given that European Muslims are procreating at three times the rate of non-Muslims -- and given the "logarithmic rate" of growth of jihadist ideology in the U.S., according to a new report by the New York Police Department's Intelligence Division -- it may be sooner than that.Peace be upon us.

Kathleen Parker can be reached at kparker@kparker.com.
Copyright © 2007, Orlando Sentinel

My comment:

Bishop Muskin's heart is in the right place, no doubt. And, in terms of God identification, the Muslim worships the God of Abraham, the father through Hagar of the Arab race. So Jew and Muslim, in that sense, serve the same God. So why can't we all just get along?

Throw Jesus into the mix, as Parker suggests above, and you've got problems. Jews do not regard him as their savior and Muslims regard him as a savior, but demote him from the position accorded him in the New Testament as Lord of the cosmos. These are "monotheists" all, but Jesus is the wild card.

Thus it is that Mohammed nods to Jews and Christians as "people of the book," and they are redeemable as long as they submit to Allah. So, Ms. Parker suggests, is this peacemaking or submission on the part of the retiring Bishop?

Jesus, the Prince of Peace, said he didn't come to bring peace but division into this world. And that he has done. His claims are so outrageous that they are either true or he has buffaloed billions into believing in a myth. There is no compromise on this issue of Jesus' identity as lone savior. And perhaps millions of Christians have given their lives for that reason alone: they would not compromise that distinction, that Jesus is the only name that saves. Jesus is the only religion worth a hoot.

Jesus also taught "blessed are the peacemakers." So how do we "make peace" when just the mention of Jesus' superiority brings division? The key is another Jesus principle: "Pray for your enemies." It is hard to hate someone you are concerned about. It is even harder to hate when you do good to those who oppose and hate you. They are disarmed by it.

In this world, democracy is the most we can hope for to help people who disagree sharply live together in a state of constant truce. Solomon said, "A soft answer turns away wrath." Living with violence is so ugly we all should want to avoid it. And we often do, with a kind of live and let live philosophy. But sooner or later, the dragon of war will rear its head.

Formerly Christian Europe, now in a state of apostasy, is becoming a Muslim stronghold. Christians living there face a real dilemma. They face extinction. Will the Muslims ~ indeed can they ~ compromise the goal of their faith which, according to Mohammed, is ultimate theocratic occupation of the world?

Kathleen Parker touches on a very sensitive issue here. When are we making peace and when are we compromising? In Africa, Muslims and Christians shoot at one another. Is civil war on the horizon in Europe? Tough decisions are coming for both the Muslim and the "infidel."

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Tabernacle Secrets

The above picture was retrieved from this web address.

Exodus 25: (New International Version)
40 See that you make them according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.

Examining the picture above shows that the Tabernacle of Moses has certain dimensions. These dimensions may be significant.

Moses' design was given to him by God. This was the foundation of Jewish worship, and it is divinely inspired. But it was more than just a kind of Jewish liturgy that was being introduced ~ it was a great big prophetic picture. That is, it was a huge object lesson teaching about something important and still future. It was meant even to instruct the Jews through its symbolism: so they would recognize their Messiah when He came.

For us, today, it is a detailed picture of Jesus: even down to the fact that the furniture was arranged in the form of a cross. It also predicts, seemingly, the times and seasons. And there is increasing interest in the church in these things, for a good reason.

Biblical history in our universities is now just a curiosity. Academics give far more credence to their own constructions of history that are based on Archaeology. For this reason, Christians who insist on taking the Bible at face value struggle with the representations of history that are given in our classrooms.

But when we are considering a prophetic picture given by God, the scriptures have long provided a valid concept of history that is more mystical and metaphysical. When we take the ancient chronologies given in the Masoretic text we are confronted with a picture of Old Testament history that spans precisely 4,000 years. These 4 millennia were divided up into 2 periods of 2K each by ancient Jewish scholars. By this, they understood there were to be 3 ages of man in God's cosmology: the age of Adam, the age of Moses (or the Law), and the age of the Messiah.

When we look at the Tabernacle of Moses, we see this reflected. We see three compartments with specific dimensions. These dimensions are thought by some to relate to significant time-frames in Jewish and Gentile history.

Moses led the children of Israel out of Egypt in about 1500BC. The dimensions of the outer court of the tabernacle is 1500 cubic cubits (15 x 10 x 10 ).

The inner court or Holy Place has the dimension of 2,000 (20 x 10 x 10). Christian scholars sometimes interpret this as the "Church Age": from first advent to second advent. Does it have to turn out exact? No. But at present we have not necessarily reached 2,000 years. The church has only existed since its birth in 30AD. It is possible this age is about over.

The final dimensions of the Holy of Holies is 10 x 10 x 10 or 1,000. This seems to many to represent the idea of a "millennial reign" of the Savior here on earth. But many scholars do not buy that possibility and rule it out as being a too literal take on the scriptures. Other ways of looking at the picture emerge. There is no final agreement on these things.

The point of all this may not be to find a key that unlocks sealed secrets, like the exact date of the Lord's return. But there still emerges, even in the tabernacle design, a generalized picture of the plan of God for mankind. It is useful as an object lesson about the Messiah and His ultimate mission.

The Jews were a prophetic people, guided by prophets and "types and shadows". God gave them the law, the feasts, the Temple and even the picture of the seminal creation "week" revealed in Genesis. All of these things pointed to Jesus and His ultimate purpose. Today we are beginning to access the truths contained in the Jewish religion, the heavenly pattern that predicts the whole work of God from day 1 to the Sabbath and beyond. And the Tabernacle turns out to be a beautiful gem, loaded with divine information.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Leaving Flatland



I recently saw that psychologist/philosopher Ken Wilber was on Brian McLaren's reading list, and I thought I'd take a look at him. To boil Wilber down to blog simplicity is to do him disservice. His wide popularity is for a reason. He makes a lot of sense. But how in the world does he relate to Christianity?



Wilber's ideas are what I would call "holistic evolution." He has charted or graphed what he believes are the four directions of evolution, that boil down to 3 directions: I, it, and we. You can't grasp this in a blog, and could barely squeeze it in to the space provided.



So what would be McLaren's interest in this guy (McLaren knows how to stay in hot water with the Christian community)? Emergent Christians are processing what I would call the Big Story, something I am also interested in doing with the 7K metaphor. McLaren calls it "the story we find ourselves in." His approach is different than mine; and he would probably find some of my theology a bit antique. But maybe not, because he appreciates how things fit together, as well as all forms of theological exploration. My approach is to pull up something ancient and see how it predicts where we are at now. Wilber does something similar, but in a different vein.



Age_____Characteristic____Psychology______Worldview
5-9 mo
._Adualism_________Psychosis_______Archaic
<2yrs._emotional_________borderline______magic>
4____Conceptual_________Neurotic_______Mythic
6____Moral/Conventional__Script pathology__Prejudice
11___Worldcentric______Identity Crisis_____Modern 15+__Integrated________________________Post-modern


Just to explain Wilber's concept outlined above: We move up through the stages of life. This may relate to stages of growth in faith as well. But Wilber touches on the psychological states in each step of life from childhood to adolescence to adulthood. And there are characteristics that tend to mark each stage. For instance, the first stage of life, babyhood, is marked by "adualism." In other words, babies don't differentiate anything in their surroundings: it is too new.


If a trauma occurs at this stage of life, it can produce psychosis later on. The psychotic is then sort of riveted to this undifferentiated approach to the world around him. This stage of life has not been resolved. The natural maturation process has been broken.


This also relates to the "we", to societies. The earliest societies were archaic. The religion we get from these primitives is called "animism." It is the belief that all things have souls, basically. It is a worldview that is adual: it doesn't differentiate. It is totally unsophisticated. Today we find it in the most basic tribal systems in Africa, Australia, South America, and Washington DC (just kidding).


So Wilber traces this development up through the stages of this growth or progress or evolution as we actually see it in persons and history. He looks at all these processes as a whole, how they relate, and what they tell us.


We end up with societies reaching the place we are at now: high integration and post-modernism. What he calls the "flatland" of modernism is passing away. But Wilber is not content with present post-modernism because it is even more negative, still dwelling in "flatland", which is devoid of what he calls "Spirit."


When a person reaches adulthood, they have hopefully become integrated. Life has educated them to the point they can function. But modernism, even in the church, has in many ways sucked "spirit" out of society. We are utterly fragmented and shattered. Post-modernism reflects this utter fragmentation. All absolutes become suspect. The laws of the universe unravel when we get to the core. All we have left is what we believe from our own perspectives. And in the big picture even that is suspect.


In the church and religion in general (particularly monotheist) this paradigm shift creates a panic reaction from those who have embraced their modernistic reductionism. They erect a big stop sign to tell their followers "go no further." This tactic is a mistake. But it will create a crisis. 9-11 is a symbol of this. The world is polarized between the modern and post-modern at this moment. Fundamentalism is quaking and not wanting to give up its security blanket.


What this means for Christians is that they must change. The church needs to seek integration, wholeness. The church needs to humble itself in the face of these forces. The church still has the answer. But the modern equations and formulas will no longer suffice. They will lose their pontency. They will not be enough.


Basically, Wilber is trying to leave Flatland without losing what was good about it. He is hoping for a kind of psychological leap to occur in mankind, an integrating of the spiritual dimension into the social fabric. He has a vision of wholeness.


He wouldn't be thinking that the church has to get there first. But it does. Because the church has the answer: not in its seemingly endless versions of how to do Christianity, but in the One it is pointing to. Wilber wouldn't see it this way, of course; but he is trying to unlock truth, and he is looking at these things in ways most of us don't, certainly. He brings to the table an understanding of how the cuisine of history is finally shaping up in the oven, and what is lacking to make it a gourmet's delight.